Wikis / The Liandri Archives / Talk:Unreal Tournament 2003

Link with UT2003 story info which can be added. Some things more relevant to the different species articles etc.. Retodon8 17:05, 30 October 2007 (EDT)

There's a problem. Before UT3 was announced, the old UT page had a historical timeline of Tournament history. It said absolutely nothing about an alien invasion and, seeing that the info came from the original site before it was fully dedicated to UT3, it is likely that the invasion was retconned.--Amitakartok 08:44, 18 May 2009 (EDT)

I got it: "The storyline for UC was not used in its sister game UT2003, nor was it ever referred to in other titles, leading to believe Epic does not consider the storyline canon." So the story on this page is for UC, not UT2003.--Amitakartok 09:07, 18 May 2009 (EDT)

Indeed. UC is in the future (although near future), so it might as well happen some time later. --GreatEmerald 13:26, 18 May 2009 (EDT)

I found the relevant page! [1] This is a timeline leading from the Human/Skaarj wars to UT2004.--Amitakartok 14:56, 19 May 2009 (EDT)

I definitely think the CBP maps are worth mentioning somewhere, but they shouldn't be included in the main map listings. – Haarg 16:30, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

But other BPs are there. It could be useful if there was another section only for BP maps. --GreatEmerald 16:37, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

The other bonus packs were created by Epic though. The CBP content was widely publicized, but aside from that is just like any other custom content. – Haarg 16:39, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

But it wasn't created just by anyone as well. The CBP team even created CBP for UT3 etc. And Clawfist created maps for even several Unreal games. --GreatEmerald 16:49, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

The people involved were obviously talented, and have been involved in the Unreal community. But that doesn't mean that the CBP was sanctioned by Epic. As I say, it should have a listing somewhere, but not inline with official content. – Haarg 17:10, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

Hmm... Under User Created Content that is now empty? But they're still not quite regular users :) --GreatEmerald 05:10, 5 April 2008 (EDT)